Showing posts with label PPC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PPC. Show all posts

Thursday, August 07, 2008

What happened to the Long Tail of search?

Many of us will remember how, just a few years ago, many search engines and digital marketing agencies espoused the benefits of bidding for long tail search queries.

It was widely believed in some circles – indeed, some evangelised continuously – that users would gradually use a selection of keywords when searching, especially for travel products.

The theory went that search phrases such as “holiday rome”, for example, would be replaced by something along the lines of “city break rome pantheon april gatwick four star”.

There were some who even suggested long tail search queries would transform keyword bidding and SEO practices within two years.

So did it happen?

The MD of a London-based search agency, whom we met with yesterday, suggests it has not at all.

Consumers, our man with the data tells us, are refining their search phrase each time, rather than using long tail search queries to find specific travel product if they do not find appropriate results the first time.

For example: “holiday rome” becomes “city break rome” or “weekend away vatican” or “hotel rome weekend”. The use of lengthy and detailed phrases to hopefully narrow the number of results just hasn’t proven popular as many first believed.

What are the reasons for this?

Consumers may be sceptical that long, meandering search phrases do not return the required and, most importantly, quality information.

Secondly, users have perhaps found that refining the initial search with more detail is a far more successful method.

Or it could be something else entirely.

Indeed, these could be the wildly incorrect thoughts of a crazy digital marketer, so any additional comments readers have would be much appreciated.

Kevin May, editor, Travolution

Friday, May 23, 2008

Google search trademark - Open Thread

It feels like we've reached a pivotal moment in the long running Google saga.

A new dedicated page - The Google brand name policy switch - on the main Travolution website has all the articles and blog posts over the past six weeks, plus a selection of other articles from around the web and resources for advertisers and agencies.

But now it's time for a discussion. Use the comments section to kickstart the debate.

* What has been the impact on your business so far?
* Do you support Teletext or Directline?
* Are you a 'little guy' enjoying the chance to spread your message into new channels?
* Would you join a cross-industry challenge against Google?

Or

* Why can't we just move on...?

Full coverage here.

Kevin May, editor, Travolution

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Future growth in display, not search

Or so says, Tim Brown, managing director of Blue Lithium EU.

The forecast came during a forum on ad networks at the AOP this week.

Kevin May, editor, Travolution

Technorati tags:

Thursday, August 30, 2007

The top 10 errors of international SEO

A lengthy but excellent post here from one of our guest bloggers, Andy Atkins-Krüger, managing director of Web Certain:

Putting this post together, I realised why so many expert highly successful SEOs don’t enjoy the same success when they go international; the potential pitfalls are simply different. All their years of experience and their gut instincts don’t give them the right answers.

I remember my days training people to sail racing dinghies. Newcomers always made the same error – the yacht would heal as the wind filled the sails – but, instead of leaning out and backwards from the dinghy creating a counterbalance, our trainees would head for the middle and WALLOP – get very wet.

Dripping wet international SEOs, are towelling themselves off from similar experiences internationally! From personal experience I have seen errors in the international field which range from highly technical subtle differences – to pure rank stupidity.

Let’s get the really stupid one out of the way first.

Error One: IP Redirection

An international web-based company with a site which targets the far east to Europe and north America wants to point its US visits away from a very popular UK site. Easy, let’s just point all the American IP addresses over to our international dot com site, they say. Clap clap, job done. Days later traffic levels don’t just go off a cliff they dig a trench in the ravine and the ER team (Web Certain in whites) is called in. Now don’t you just know that they redirected the search engine crawlers too – wasn’t that obvious to you…?

Error Two: Autotranslation

I once came across a site where all of its non-English content had been auto-translated – to generate traffic. The problem was that our team of non-auto-translators (we call them that to keep them on their toes) couldn’t understand the first thing about the content – it was so far from having any value. In fact, it was easier to for them to work from the original English. Now in that process of autotranslation, our carefully crafted keywords become thoroughly mangled. In fact I’m starting a campaign to get the words “AUTOTRANSLATIOM KILLS KEYWORDS” added as warning on the packet.

Error Three: Assume everyone speaks English

Not exactly an SEO error – but certainly a missed opportunity as well as a cultural one. This presents difficulties on two levels; the audience may well understand English – but if you’re trying to persuade them to buy something – you’re going to be more successful talking to them in their own language, especially as your competitors are probably already doing that.

But there is a second reason why this is an error: the scope for keyword variety and therefore maximum potential for the site is much reduced by not expanding into the customer’s own languages.

Error Four: Several languages on the same page

This seems to crop up less frequently but not so long ago there was a fashion for the same web page to be published in, for example, English, French and German in different columns. However, this error still crops up but more subtlely and less deliberately where the metatags and page content are in different languages – and this we see frequently particularly for sites run by content management systems.

Error Five: No local inbound links

Today it is common knowledge that to succeed with search engines you need to have inbound links. But that becomes doubly more complex when you have different countries and languages to consider – and you need links from both. You can have some really strange things happen with page rank between countries too and a high page rank does not guarantee success in a particular language (because often the inbound links have been linked in English).

Error Six: Using only a dot com

This is a truly world phenomenon. So many organisations find that for either political or technical reasons – or because they think it looks good – they end up with a dot com and can’t shift from it. There are ways of mitigating the impact of this of course – like local links – but the people who will win the good fight in the end are those with the local country domains.

Error Seven: Duplication of content between countries

The way this happens is that the company hierarchy bounces the most recent web budget asking why it’s costing so much – “And why do we have translation costs for both Germany AND Austria – don’t they speak the same language”. They do of course – but an Austrian page in German is going to disappear into the ether in search engine listings terms. The reason is because it will be a duplicate of the same page in the company’s German site – which on a law of averages will be better linked because German is just a touch bigger than Austria (don’t tell the in-laws…). So you may need special content – just for the Austrians please.

Error Eight: Javascript changes the language content

This happens more often than you might think where javascript – controls the language setting of the page and pulls in a different language to the same template following the user’s instruction. The problem is that search engine crawlers don’t follow javascript navigation (which this is of course) so languages other than the default (English usually) just disappear.

Error Nine: Links in a different language to content

Now how many times have I seen this – or error messages the same. Let’s assume the main navigation has been changed, there are many sites where you still find odd little links in the footer – that really should have been translated and haven’t been. One or two and you’ll get away with it possible – but don’t overdo it!

Error Ten: Language code not set to the correct language

Very common – and the more minor of our peccadilloes for today. In fact, I did a study of this a few years ago and found that the majority of the Government web sites around Europe were actually encoded ‘en’ for general English and it didn’t have a huge impact on their rankings (thanks to being link loved by their own communities of course).

Summary

The above 10 errors are not the whole story. All the normal SEO errors still apply and I haven’t delved into the depths of hosting which is a whole story in its own right. But the fact is that the above errors are repeated so often that I think this must be a useful checklist to avoid the most typical pitfalls. Now I’m going back to our non-automatic non-alien humanoid team (otherwise known as international SEO experts from around the globe) to see the latest little linguistic challenge the world of SEO has brought to us.

Andy Atkins-Krüger, managing director, Web Certain

Technorati tags:

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Google: fill yer boots

The value of online advertising in Europe is set to reach £10.8 billion by 2012.

A report from Forrester reckons revenue from online ads will account for 18% of the overall marketing cake within seven years, eclipsing national press, radio, billboards, regional press and consumer magazines, and heaping pressure on the giants of TV.

Paid-for search accounts for around 38% of all European online advertising spend.

Google dominates...

Kevin May, editor, Travolution

The Joy of SEO

Search engine optimisation can be a fickle business at times. Indeed, travel companies up and down the land are known to agonise long into the night about where they appear on that Official Gateway to Instant Traffic, Google.

Digital marketing agencies are appointed; months are spent on designing Google-friendly landing pages; complicated keyword folksonomies are created – all in the hope that the consumer will chance upon seeing an entry in natural search listings for a company, product or destination.

And then some upstart comes along and shows them how it’s done, without any special investment.

Type “flight search engine” into Google and appearing in first place, as you might expect, is a high profile meta search engine – Skyscanner, in this case.

But what is this? In second place is that pesky Travel-Rants consumer blog.

In fact, the US version of Sidestep, IfYouSki, GooFlight and VisitBritain are the only pureplay "flight search engines" to appear on the first page.

So, well done to Mr Cronian of Travel-Rants – a developer by day with a passion for travel, writing his blog purely as a hobby.

The message here is simple: good content – or content deemed important by others on the web – can be as valuable as any investment in a digital marketing strategy.

NB: If anyone doubts whether “flight search engine” is a phrase in demand (it not being destination specific, for example), just check out the number of companies bidding against it in Google’s pay-per-click listings.

TravelSupermarket, Travelzoo, Opodo, Ebookers, Airline-Network, Kayak, SkyScanner (again), DialAFlight, Expedia and Travelocity obviously consider it worth paying money for every click.

Kevin May, editor, Travolution

Technorati tags:

Thursday, May 24, 2007

When Google ads go wrong

Here is a classic - and rather sad - case of when the automatic serving of sponsored links from Google against content can prove, er, problematic.

A UK-based obituary website, GoneTooSoon.co.uk, where visitors can post tributes to loved ones, has been critcised by users who discovered some rather inappropriate ads placed alongside content.

Links to low-cost carrier Ryanair, for example, were found next to tributes to dead boys and men named Ryan.

A page dedicated to a man who died in a motorcyle accident featured an ad for, you guessed it, motorcyles.

The owner of the site, Terry George, introduced Google ads to the site recently but, according to reports, didn't realise that links are created based on content on the same page.

Kevin May, editor, Travolution

Hat-tip: BBC

Technorati tags:

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Travolution@E4T - Expedia could charge suppliers for leads

Mild rumblings of discontent this morning at the EyeForTravel conference in London when Expedia said online travel agencies may have to take action as more of those pesky consumers are using the site as a search engine and then make a booking direct with suppliers.

Murad Hajeebhoy, vice president for lodging and destination services, said their could be a situation in the future when OTAs would consider charging suppliers for referrals.

"This is one of the possibilities" and, of course, is purely hypothetical, Hajeebhoy assured us after his Q&A session.

Needless to say, Expedia and other online travel agencies would certainly have some tricky conversations with suppliers if it decided to implement such a scheme.

Chris Silcock from Hilton, during the session, didn't appear too keen, to say the least...

Hajeebhoy said he was unclear as to how such a system would work - complicated tracking for cost-per-acquisition or a cost-per-click system?

It is very interesting that Expedia is at least thinking about this model. But what does it say about their motivation?

Are the OTAs finally acting because a huge amount of traffic is coming but so little is converting?


Kevin May, editor, Travolution

Technorati tags:

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Click fraud on the rise...

Click Forensics, Inc. , a self-described independent analysis company, today released industry pay-per-click (PPC) fraud figures for the first quarter 2007.

The results are not good.

The Click Fraud Index , as it is aptly named, found that the overall industry average click fraud rate was 14.8% for Q1 2007 versus 13.7% for the same period a year ago.

The average click fraud rate of PPC advertisements appearing on search engine content networks was 21.9%, versus 19.2% last year.

The industry average click fraud rate for high-priced search terms (defined as those costing more than $2) was 22.2%, up from 20.9%.

“It appears that click fraud perpetrators are becoming more sophisticated even as search providers step up their efforts to fight click fraud,” said Tom Cuthbert, president and CEO of Click Forensics, Inc. “Click fraud seems to be following a similar path as other online fraud schemes such as spam and phishing - the problem is growing as fraudsters fine tune their methods.”

(It's always a few bad apples who have to ruin things for the rest of us.)

If you've not already read the most recent issue of Travolution cover-to-cover (and I know most of you good boys and girls have), check out "The Dark Side of Search" article, penned by our newest contributor, Adam Woods, for an in-depth discussion on this increasingly worrying topic.

Tricia Holly Davis, chief writer, Travolution

Technorati tags:

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

AC Hotels banned by Google

Fascinating post on the excellent Blog on Travel about Spanish hotel brand AC Hotels, which has apparently been de-listed by Google.

The post explains at length perhaps why the chain has fallen foul of the search engine giant.

But in a nutshell:

  • Poor SEO
  • Mis-use of Flash
  • Bad meta-tagging
Tom's post is well worth a read. [Check the comments at the end - especially the one about the MD of AC Hotels and his supposed opinions of the internet]

Kevin may, editor, Travolution

Monday, November 13, 2006

New Opodo boss and marketing in the early days

It's been a few weeks now since Simon Vincent revealed he would be quitting as boss of the Amadeus-owned Opodo online travel agency for the world of direct selling with Hilton.

So, surely it must be time to speculate who might be in the frame for the job in the New Year.

A very well-informed source - i.e. a senior figure familiar with the process - told us this morning that the ideal person for the chief executive position would be someone from the marketing-consumer world, and not necessarily from within the travel industry.

Let the rumour-mill turn a little bit on that one.

In the meantime, demonstrating how important OTAs used to place - and still do? - on pay-per-click advertising, it turns out that Opodo spent somewhere between £300,000 and £400,000 in the first six months after its launch in 2001 in order to ensure it appeared in the Number One position for EVERY travel-related keyword.

Kevin May, editor, Travolution